sanskritfritz at gmail.com
Thu Feb 21 22:04:14 CET 2013
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Mauricio Tavares <raubvogel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Where do we stand on getting sanewall into distributions?
>> AFAIK, it's not in Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, CentOS.
>> I can probably do the Debian and Gentoo packaging at this point. I'm
>> not a dev for either project, but I've got experience building
>> packages for both. Ubuntu might be a tad stranger, simply owing to
>> their use of Upstart. In theory, systemd isn't supposed to be too
>> hard, so it should be possible to support both sysvinit and systemd on
> I think if we can put it in Debian, ubuntu is easier. By that I
> mean they keep worrying about upstream compatibility. But, I can try
> to do the ubuntu madness. In the immortal words of Jeremy Clarkson,
> what can possibly go wrong?
Archlinux package is already in the AUR:
systemd service file is included.
More information about the Sanewall-Dev